Monitors and color accuracy

Working with a lot of digital artists for years has teached me that the best solution is to include a monitor calibraing tool.

​​​​​If you don't want to print your pictures, just a good monitor will be enough.

Dell also have their UltraSharp series. Not cheap, but not expensive either.
I'm happy with mine.
https://www.dell.com/en-us/work/lp/dell-ultrasharp-monitors

Accurate color, out of the box: Each UltraSharp monitor is factory color calibrated and comes with a complete factory calibration report, giving users the confidence that colors will be accurate right from the start.

A monitor with accurate color reproduction that's good enough for professional use will run you at least $1,500, probably more.

E.g. DELL Premiercolor 27" 4K: https://www.dell.com/en-us/work/shop/dell-ultrasharp-27-4k-premiercolor-monitor-up2720q/apd/210-avbp/monitors-monitor-accessories

Cheaper monitors aren't useful for professional-level photo editing, even when calibrated (out of the factory or manually) because they either can be bright or accurate but not both at the same time--which isn't a problem for most applications, like office stuff or gaming; but for photos it is.

There's a reason the best monitors cost a lot, e.g. the Apple Pro Display XDR has 32 inches in 6K with full P3 color gamut w/ 10-bit color and is super bright but also will set you back by at least 5 kilodollars.

That said:
* Get the monitor with the widest color gamut and bit-depth you can afford
* Get the highest resolution possible, for astrophotography you will often have to deal with stars which sometimes are only visible in a single pixel in the data
* Work in a darkened room, this makes it possible to turn down the monitor brightness and gives better colors on cheaper monitors