Is this dew?

12 replies266 views
SkyHoinar avatar

Hello everyone,

I'm looking for some advice on a problem I encountered during my last imaging session.

I started shooting a new target at the end of May and had a few successful sessions over 3 consecutive nights. But due to bad weather I had to put the project on hold for about 2 weeks. During all this time my equipment was stored indoors, assembled.

Now that the weather has improved and I was able to enjoy a cloudless night, I wanted to resume the project, but I ran into a problem that almost ruined my session.

When I shoot over multiple nights, I spend some time adjusting the framing to match the framing from previous sessions as closely as possible. I do this by taking short 20-30 second exposures, looking at the position of the stars and adjusting the mount position iteratively, which usually takes me 5-10 minutes.

The problem I ran into was that I noticed, while shooting these "framing" exposures, that the image started to degrade.

Here's one of the first frames:

📷 image.pngimage.pngAnd here's one a few minutes later:

📷 image.pngimage.png(these are just screenshots)

It looked like dew to me.

What do you think? Is it dew?

So I looked at the front lens of my 80mm refractor, but I couldn't see any dew at all. There was some dust on it, but no dew.

Then I unscrewed the camera and took it inside to examine it. I looked at the sensor and again I couldn't see any dew at all. The sensor window looked absolutely clean. So I put it back on the telescope and took another picture.

And this time the problem was gone:

📷 image.pngimage.png

I've had this problem before, but I used to blame it on the cold and excessive humidity, but this time it wasn't really cold (around 15°C) and not excessively humid.

What do you think?

Well written
sharkmelley avatar

It looks like a tracking error causing those degraded stars.

Well written
Tony Gondola avatar

It looks like star trailing during the second sub, not dew.

Well written
SkyHoinar avatar

Thank you for your replies!

Hmm, star trailing/tracking error? It is true that I use to take these short exposures without the guiding active, but I only get this issue from time to time. And the first few subs were fine (between the second sub that I attached here and the first one there were another 7 subs of which were OK).

I will activate the guiding next time to see what I get.

Respectful
Scott Badger avatar

SkyHoinar · Jun 18, 2026, 07:28 PM

Thank you for your replies!

Hmm, star trailing/tracking error? It is true that I use to take these short exposures without the guiding active, but I only get this issue from time to time. And the first few subs were fine (between the second sub that I attached here and the first one there were another 7 subs of which were OK).

I will activate the guiding next time to see what I get.

Maybe you bumped the mount, a gust of wind, a large insect flying into or landing on the scope, a cable snagged……

And to replicate framing, why aren’t you platesolving?

Cheers,

Scott

Helpful Concise
Willem Jan Drijfhout avatar

Like others have mentioned not dew, but some kind of tracking error.

The stars are double, not elongated, which suggests a discontinuous error. Something flops, bumps or settles or so. Could be many things. Bump against the rig, cable snag, wind gust, backlash in the mount, unstable tripod, unstable ground, play in one of the mirrors, play in the imaging train, etc.

Try to walk back exactly what happened or what you’ve done during the times where you see this behaviour and hopefully it will give you a clue where to look.

What software do you use to control your setup? Most programs offer a method to plate-solve and re-align to certain coordinates. It will probably not take more than 10s instead of 10 mins.

Well written Helpful Respectful Engaging Supportive
SkyHoinar avatar

Dear Scott and Willem,

Thank you for your replies.

To answer first the question: I use PHD for guiding and APT for image acquisition, nothing else. The rest I do with the hand controller (I like to stay simple).

Now, analyzing the possible causes mentioned here:

  • Bumping into the mount, cable snag, gust of wind or insects on the front lens I would definitely rule them out, because it is not the case.

  • The play in the mirrors also; there are no mirrors; it’s a refractor.

  • No play in the imaging train, no unstable tripod. I am sure of that; it is one of my check points during the installation (it’s a portable setup).

  • Backlash - this is one that I would retain for further investigation (however it should manifest all the time, isn’t it?).

  • Unstable ground - it is the same place in my backyard that I use most of the time and there were no specific conditions that night like excessively wet ground.

Recapping what I did that night:

  • I took about 6-7 short 20s exposures which were OK, until I started to notice the issue

  • I took another 1 or 2 I saw that the problem was getting worse

  • I checked the front lens; a bit of dust, but OK, I did not do anything

  • I took another one and the problem was still there

  • I removed the camera, I took it inside and I looked to the sensor for traces of dew; there was nothing

  • I mounted the camera back and I took another shot: problem gone

  • During all this time the telescope stayed pointed in the same direction on the selected target

    (I have obviously not posted all these images here, but just one from the beginning, one from the middle when the problem was present and one from the end when the problem was gone)

What catches my attention is that the issue was solved after I opened the imaging train by removing the camera. By doing this I actually did two things:

  • I opened the closed space between the filter drawer and the camera sensor - which makes me think to some residual moisture in there - do you think it is possible?

  • I disconnected the camera from the power source and I reconnected it back - which makes me think to a bug or a defect which might have been eventually solved by such a “hard reset“ - that’s why I would have liked to see if others experienced something similar

On a side topic, I would like to know more about plate-solving for aligning framing. How you do it?

Thank you.

Well written Helpful Respectful Engaging
Willem Jan Drijfhout avatar

You’ve clearly looked at many factors already and ruled out several potential causes.

When you say that the problem went away after opening the imaging train, you did a lot more than open the filter drawer and disconnecting the camera. Something must have been unscrewed, the imaging train was touched, so was wiggled a bit, the whole rig was wiggled a bit as a consequence. The issue you see is very small and not much needs to happen on your rig to move the stars a few pixels. Perhaps good to also check the focuser. Focusers can sometimes have a little play in them, allowing the whole imaging train to shift a bit. And keep in mind, a few pixels is hardly anything you see very easily. Also, when after 6-7 images things got worse, what did your guiding graphs look like? Any suspicious corrections one way or the other?

One thing you can be quite certain of, this is not a dew issue. Dew would soften stars, not duplicate them.

I don’t know APT, so can’t comment on that. A quick google search came up with this, perhaps it is helpful.

In general the methodology is as follows:

  • You tell the mount where to go to, for example the target you’re going for. Most software will allow you to search on target and subsequently feed the RA/DEC coordinates to the mount.

  • Then you take a picture and have it plate solved by the software. This plate solve returns the actual RA/DEC coordinates of where the mount is now pointing to. These are often not exactly the same as what you’re aiming for.

  • The mount is now ordered to slew to the coordinates you’re looking for, from the coordinates where it is.

  • Then you take another picture and have it plate solved again. You now get a revised set of RA/DEC coordinates, hopefully closer to where you need to be. The software will have a tolerance set, so will keep repeating this process until the actual coordinates are within the tolerance of the desired coordinates.

You say you want to keep things simple using the hand controller. I understand that, but there are many people out there that would argue that using a hand controller to control your rig is more challenging than to make use of standard software routines in imaging software such as NINA, KStars or others.

Good luck with trouble shooting!

CS, Willem Jan.

Well written Helpful Engaging
SkyHoinar avatar

Willem Jan Drijfhout · Jun 19, 2026, 08:25 PM

Also, when after 6-7 images things got worse, what did your guiding graphs look like? Any suspicious corrections one way or the other?

I was not guiding actually. I never activate the guiding during this procedure. The tracking of the mount was always enough for such short exposures.

Tony Gondola avatar

Willem Jan Drijfhout · Jun 19, 2026, 08:25 PM

You say you want to keep things simple using the hand controller. I understand that, but there are many people out there that would argue that using a hand controller to control your rig is more challenging than to make use of standard software routines in imaging software such as NINA, KStars or others.

I would totally agree. I might seem simple because it’s understood but in the end, a more modern approach would actually end up being the simplest solution.

SkyHoinar avatar

I respect your opinion, but I am part of the other group. The simplest solution for me is the one I am feeling more comfortable with 🙂

Tony Gondola avatar

Big shrug….

Anyway, back to your problem. There’s no doubt that something moved during your exposure. As you’ve checked everything else, the last possibility is your mount. If you can check if the displacement lines up with DEC or RA, that will at least tell you where to look for a problem. I guiding graph will tell you a lot too. If it is the mount when you are running un-guided and it happens only occasionally then just throw out the bad frames and stack the rest.

Helpful Concise
Scott Badger avatar

SkyHoinar · Jun 19, 2026, 08:55 PM

I respect your opinion, but I am part of the other group. The simplest solution for me is the one I am feeling more comfortable with 🙂

Felt exactly that way…..until I tried it.

Cheers,

Scott