Christian Bennich avatar

Hi All
I hope that you have some experience that can help me here.

When I image low on the horizon, my stars are not good📷 image.png image.png
Near Zenith - same star.
📷 image.pngimage.png
Yesterday I realised that my Primary mirror shifted - and that most likely was the cause of this.
I pulled it out, and it did indeed shift when I tilted the mirror cell.

After tightening, I do however still see slight shifting of the primary mirror. (the first image is after reduing the shifting - it was worse before)

So my question is, should I tighten the supporting rubber pads a bit more (risking pinched stars), should I (if possible) buy a new set - as I have never seen this problem before - and maybe they have been worn or something.
I use the Skywatcher 200 PDS - anybody who knows if the rubbert support pads can be bought anywhere?

Thank you in advance for any input on this.

Helpful Respectful Concise Engaging
andrea tasselli avatar
Yes, they shift and they do it all the time and they roll too. The "how much is too much" is the only relevant question here. The best advice I can give is to tighten a belt around the outer edge of mirror and around the 3 mirror side support thingies. Rubber pads do not wear but may become stiff with time. Mine are made of cork though and they hardly age.
Christian Bennich avatar

I “fixed” it by pushing a little spacer between the rubber pad and the side of the mirror, now it does not move around 😉

Let’s see how it works over time.

thank you @andrea tasselli 👍💪

Engaging Supportive
Tony Gondola avatar

I’m not going to ask you why you’re shooting low to the horizon…..:)

With rubber pads one would expect a tiny bit of shift at very low angles just because the rubber will compress a bit but it shouldn’t be any more than that. I would remove the rear cell and adjust things so that you see no movement with change of angle. You might also need to loosen things up a little when the cold weather returns. You could change the rubber pads out for plastic for just a bit less movement.

If you see any effects after that it will probably just be due to side loading the mirror causing potato chipping. I wouldn’t expect that in a 200mm mirror but you never know. Primary mirror cells like yours are design to back load and once you start getting away from that, you’re pretty much out of spec.

Well written Helpful Respectful Engaging Supportive
Christian Bennich avatar

Fair non-question 😝😝

Your suggestion is essentially what I ended up with.

No more shifting around - it took a few iterations though 💪

Gabi Pereira avatar

Christian Bennich · Mar 6, 2026, 07:30 PM

Hi All
I hope that you have some experience that can help me here.

When I image low on the horizon, my stars are not good📷 image.png image.png
Near Zenith - same star.
📷 image.pngimage.png
Yesterday I realised that my Primary mirror shifted - and that most likely was the cause of this.
I pulled it out, and it did indeed shift when I tilted the mirror cell.

After tightening, I do however still see slight shifting of the primary mirror. (the first image is after reduing the shifting - it was worse before)

So my question is, should I tighten the supporting rubber pads a bit more (risking pinched stars), should I (if possible) buy a new set - as I have never seen this problem before - and maybe they have been worn or something.
I use the Skywatcher 200 PDS - anybody who knows if the rubbert support pads can be bought anywhere?

Thank you in advance for any input on this.

Yo e comprado una lámina de Goma Eva negra y e sentado el espejo literalmente sobre ella . Los soportes con tornillos solo sirven ahora para que no se salga para adelante. 😁😁 Porque a entrado bien justo . Cortés lo que sobraba y encima puse mi anillo protector de reflejos. Y creo que e solucionado varias cosas a la vez. Las luces traseras , los movimientos laterales y evitar apretar de más los tornillos de momento funciona perfecto . Después de la modificación. . otro punto débil si tienes el enfocador original de los PDS es que ellos tienen un juego en la corredera … hay tonillos que lo ajustan desde fuera. Porque también sino al inclinar el telescopio se mueve. La prueba final es retraer el enfocador con el láser y que jamás se mueva de su punto . Yo compré un QUATTRO 200 F4 y venía todo mal 😔😔 tuve que desarmarlo y ajustarlo todo . En los viajes de fábrica a tienda … todo se afloja . 🤦🏻🤷‍♂️

Seizal Bong avatar

Mirror shift can be such a pain, especially when you're trying to get a perfect focus for imaging. Using an external focuser (like a Crayford) and just locking the primary mirror down really is the way to go. It makes a world of difference in stability.

Well written Concise Engaging Supportive
Tony Gondola avatar

Seizal Bong · Mar 7, 2026, 12:21 PM

Mirror shift can be such a pain, especially when you're trying to get a perfect focus for imaging. Using an external focuser (like a Crayford) and just locking the primary mirror down really is the way to go. It makes a world of difference in stability.

That’s not his problem exactly. He’s using a Newtonian, not an SCT.

Well written
Craig Towell avatar

I do get the same thing with my 200pds. It’s been an issue with Newtonian pretty much ever since they were invented: Holding the mirror tight enough to prevent any movement but not too tight to cause deformation. It’s a very fine line.

My own solution is simply not to image so low down, and if I have to I’ll rely on BlurX to fix it. I did not want to add in extra supports or shims and risk restricting or pinching the mirror which could negatively affect the image quality at all other orientations

Well written Helpful Respectful Engaging
Dan_I avatar

Craig Towell · Mar 7, 2026, 08:50 PM

It’s been an issue with Newtonian pretty much ever since they were invented: Holding the mirror tight enough to prevent any movement but not too tight to cause deformation. It’s a very fine line.

A well-made mirror cell handles this without problem. For a 200mm primary mirror, the lateral clearance between the cell and the mirror edge can be as low as 0.1mm overall to account for differential thermal expansion. It’s really a problem of mechanical design (with known solutions).

Well written Concise
andrea tasselli avatar
Much less than that.
Dan_I avatar

andrea tasselli · Mar 8, 2026, 10:12 PM

Much less than that.

it depends on the material used. For an aluminum cell 0.1mm is OK up to -10°C if I remember well, with a carbon cell smaller values are possible.

Helpful Concise
Craig Towell avatar

Dan_I · Mar 8, 2026 at 09:14 PM

Craig Towell · Mar 7, 2026, 08:50 PM

It’s been an issue with Newtonian pretty much ever since they were invented: Holding the mirror tight enough to prevent any movement but not too tight to cause deformation. It’s a very fine line.

A well-made mirror cell handles this without problem. For a 200mm primary mirror, the lateral clearance between the cell and the mirror edge can be as low as 0.1mm overall to account for differential thermal expansion. It’s really a problem of mechanical design (with known solutions).

Yeah exactly, a very fine line. It can be done but mass manufacturers don’t design their cells with such care.

Related discussions
Refractor collimation question
When i defocus, the center of the defocused stars are all shifted in the same direction across the field. If the primary cell was out of collimation, would the center of defocused stars be radially off center around the field? Or is this tilt? The pr...
Primary mirror shift causes uniform star center displacement across field.
Sep 11, 2024
Pinched Optics?
Are pinched optics causing these ugly star spikes? If so, what can I do about them?
Discusses mirror alignment issues affecting star quality; relevant to optical problems.
Jan 26, 2026
No photometry stars in NSG
Hi all Does anyone have any pointers in regards to the warning: “No photometry stars found” Never seen it before, and comparing frames I don’t see any apparent differences on the frames. Thank you.
Mirror issues can affect star detection and photometry calibration.
Feb 21, 2025
Possible RASA 8 Mirror Shift Issues on Long Exposures
Hello all RASA users! I recently bought a RASA 8 that had been in use for several years. After the first tests I didn’t notice any problems, but when I moved to 15-minute exposures, the stars turned into streaks. It feels like the guide scope is not ...
Shifting primary mirror; directly matches author's identified root cause
Aug 23, 2025
Diffraction Pattern Question
So I’ve acquired a small Sharpstar 15028hnt F/2.8 newt and been playing with it to see if it’s truly capable of delivering or working across a full frame sensor. It’s been a couple weeks of precise bench collimation, star testing, tilting, backfocus ...
Primary mirror shifting causes off-axis aberrations like author's diffraction pattern.
Aug 27, 2025