Dwarf Mini smart telescope first impressions

Equipment Deep Sky Review
6 replies•191 views
David Cruz avatar
David Cruz avatar

I was finally able to test the new Dwarf Mini last weekend. Coming from a 10-inch Newtonian, my expectations were not very high in terms of resolution and detail. What I was most curious about, though, was processing the data myself to see if the quality would shine through.

To my surprise, the result is pretty amazing, especially when comparing the original stack to the processed one. This smart telescope was also really fun and easy to operate. Overall, I’ve totally changed my opinion about Smart Telescopes; I’ve seen firsthand the potential they have—if, and that’s a big 'if', the image processing is done well.

I plan to do a 2-panel mosaic of this Horsehead image, but for now, here is the comparison and the final result.

Acquisition:
160x90s 120Gain EQ Mode

Editing:
Pixinsight
Photoshop

HorseHead_Post1.jpgHorseHead_Post2.jpg

Well Written Respectful Concise Engaging Supportive
Tom Engwall avatar
Tom Engwall avatar

Thanks for posting that . It definitely is useful to see what can be produced by the dwarf mini after skilled processing. I am impressed.

Respectful Supportive
Vin avatar
Vin avatar

Yes they are surprisingly good - especially given that it’s uncooled cameras. Their on-board processing is not really that good though - it’s better to download the lights and process them yourself. The other thing I found is that it’s worth blinking the lights yourself - don’t trust the on-board rejection of files b/c sometimes quite a few good lights are still in there.

They are certainly far more user-friendly than sky trackers with DSLRs, but the latter gives you much better choice in framing and FOV.

I enjoyed using my Dwarf3 a lot, but have recently sold it.

https://app.astrobin.com/i/1rl589

https://app.astrobin.com/i/tkqmyc

I think a very interesting thing would be for Pegasus Astro to adapt their SmartEye with one of these uncooled 585 sensors instead of the 533. Much lighter, much smaller, less power hungry, and the ability to make a much wider range of smart telescopes than the set focal lengths of the Seestars and Dwarves.

Well Written Helpful Respectful Concise Engaging
David Cruz avatar
David Cruz avatar

Let’s see if I can get a Top Pick with the final two panel mosaic image😄 I think that would be a nice achivement

Tee Beave avatar
Tee Beave avatar

I agree.

I posted an image the other day with a little commentary of how impressed I am with it.

https://app.astrobin.com/u/teebeavehere?i=805ki0

It’s fun, quick, easy, small, light, etc. I see it as a great way for new users to get into the hobby!

Supportive
Joey Conenna avatar
Joey Conenna avatar

I am guessing BlurXTerminator was used? How different are the images if BlurXTerminator is not used? The result is amazing, and difference in the resolution between the two results is astounding.

Respectful Engaging Supportive
Tee Beave avatar
Tee Beave avatar

📷 IMG_5192.jpegIMG_5192.jpegin fact, I just put it out next to my main rig.