Dwarf Mini smart telescope first impressions - Forums

Topic starter

Feb 16, 2026

I was finally able to test the new Dwarf Mini last weekend. Coming from a 10-inch Newtonian, my expectations were not very high in terms of resolution and detail. What I was most curious about, though, was processing the data myself to see if the quality would shine through.

To my surprise, the result is pretty amazing, especially when comparing the original stack to the processed one. This smart telescope was also really fun and easy to operate. Overall, I’ve totally changed my opinion about Smart Telescopes; I’ve seen firsthand the potential they have—if, and that’s a big 'if', the image processing is done well.

I plan to do a 2-panel mosaic of this Horsehead image, but for now, here is the comparison and the final result.

Acquisition:
160x90s 120Gain EQ Mode

Editing:
Pixinsight
Photoshop

Well Written Respectful Concise Engaging Supportive

Tom Engwall

Feb 16, 2026

Thanks for posting that . It definitely is useful to see what can be produced by the dwarf mini after skilled processing. I am impressed.

Respectful Supportive

Vin

Feb 16, 2026

Yes they are surprisingly good - especially given that it’s uncooled cameras. Their on-board processing is not really that good though - it’s better to download the lights and process them yourself. The other thing I found is that it’s worth blinking the lights yourself - don’t trust the on-board rejection of files b/c sometimes quite a few good lights are still in there.

They are certainly far more user-friendly than sky trackers with DSLRs, but the latter gives you much better choice in framing and FOV.

I enjoyed using my Dwarf3 a lot, but have recently sold it.

https://app.astrobin.com/i/1rl589

https://app.astrobin.com/i/tkqmyc

I think a very interesting thing would be for Pegasus Astro to adapt their SmartEye with one of these uncooled 585 sensors instead of the 533. Much lighter, much smaller, less power hungry, and the ability to make a much wider range of smart telescopes than the set focal lengths of the Seestars and Dwarves.

Well Written Helpful Respectful Concise Engaging

David Cruz

Topic starter

Feb 16, 2026

Let’s see if I can get a Top Pick with the final two panel mosaic image😄 I think that would be a nice achivement

Adam

Feb 17, 2026

I agree.

I posted an image the other day with a little commentary of how impressed I am with it.

https://app.astrobin.com/u/teebeavehere?i=805ki0

It’s fun, quick, easy, small, light, etc. I see it as a great way for new users to get into the hobby!

Supportive

Joey Conenna

Feb 17, 2026

I am guessing BlurXTerminator was used? How different are the images if BlurXTerminator is not used? The result is amazing, and difference in the resolution between the two results is astounding.

Respectful Engaging Supportive

Adam

Feb 17, 2026

📷 IMG_5192.jpegin fact, I just put it out next to my main rig.

Vin

Feb 17, 2026

Yes you definitely have to use BXT in correct only mode to clean up the stars. The on-board processing software does not do as good a job as processing it yourself.

Another weakness in the current capabilities of these is the inability to use as fully remote units. Some of this is software (although there is now an INDI driver for Seestars I believe, but not yet for Dwarf). There are workarounds (eg Dwarfium) but it’s not ideal. And one big hardware issue which is that I believe they can’t be power cycled remotely - you actually need someone (or something) to press the on button. I believe someone at SFRO made a little physical bot to do this!

If those two things could be sorted out, you could piggyback these on your main rig and yet have it pointed at a completely different object from your main rig (a limitation of conventional piggyback systems).

Well Written Helpful Insightful Respectful Engaging

Tom Gray

Mar 3, 2026

Thanks for sharing your first impressions. I have had mine for a week, and already loving the simplicity and portability. I bought it primarily for bike / back-packing adventures. No doubt resolution is low, but sensitivity pretty good, and setup a breeze. I’ve found the Stellar Studio App does a pretty decent job, but like others have downloaded, blinked and pre/post processed using Siril. I’ve posted a few images, but waiting to try under really dark skies, where I can confidently drizzle the data.

Well Written Respectful Concise Engaging Supportive

Related discussions

Any Low Cost Astrophotography Setup Suggestions For Great Results?

Hello. I am looking for astrophotography setup suggestions/ideas for $2000 or less in total that would be able to deliver great imaging results, such as of Deep Sky objects like galaxies in a natural color and also objects like comets as well. I curr...

Smart telescope alternative for deep-sky imaging comparable to Seestar S50.

Apr 21, 2024

Astrophotography on a Budget: My €341.12 ($399) DIY Harmonic Mount Review & PHD2 Test

V3 Mini Performance: My Results After Two Months of Testing (Solar & Deep-Sky) Hello everyone, Lately, my inbox has been flooded with questions about the performance of my V3 Mini mount. After more than two months of rigorous testing, I wanted to...

Tests smart telescope performance; author interested in equipment testing and results.

Sep 11, 2025

Canon EF 300mm f/4 L astrophotography comparison: non-IS vs IS version

Hello all, I am excited to share this test report I wanted to make ever since I acquired both lenses, in an effort to help the community. I will also attach it to the thread for easy download. Enjoy your read and I hope this comparison helps you make...

Compares optical equipment performance; relevant to author's interest in equipment evaluation.

Feb 3, 2026

A Comparison - Fast vs. Large

Of the many diatribes in AP world one of the most recurrent is the role that "fast" optics plays in achieving a given result or more generally speaking whether being "fast" is better than being "large". And here is the c...

Discusses optical performance factors; relates to author's focus on resolution and detail.

Jul 27, 2025