What few things have made the biggest improvements in your astrophotography?

Andy WrayDale PowellRonny MayDie Launische Diva
56 replies1.7k views
Andy Wray avatar
I just wondered what few things had improved your ability to take good astrophotographs?

For me, so far, the journey has been:

* adding a coma corrector to my Newtonian … stars went from horrible ovals to round all of a sudden
* adding an autoguider .. went from 30s captures to 300s
* adopting ASCOM and dropping the hand controller
* using SharpCap to polar align
* using APT to automate everything
* replacing my mirrorless camera and moving to a dedicated mono camera and filter wheel
* adding an autofocuser
* learning PixInsight at last
* sorting the cable management so that I don't worry about cable snags any more
* finding a way to control my mount/scope from inside rather than sitting in the cold all night (active USB cable in my case)

I have a lot to learn, but it would be interesting to know what other key things have made a difference?
Helpful Engaging
Steven avatar
Money.


But, more serious. the same things.
obviously spending the money to upgrade your acquisition helps. mounts, guiding, etc.

For me the ZWO ASIAIR has been the biggest upgrade.
Running on mas iOS I always had issues with drivers, connecting, compatibility. So I very quickly went for the ASIAIR solution.
Has everything in it, gave me plate solving, polar alignment, assists with darks, flats, etc, guiding. + the comfort of sitting inside.

Everything else is improvements in the post processing part. Learning what works and what doesn't.
Gamaholjad avatar
All of the above
* The community, no question is a dumb question. I've even had authors send me some of there tips.
* Mount probably the most important piece of equipment. 
*.Building my own observatory, god this has allowed me to save a huge amount of time to explore. And yes it's got a warm room, my house is to far away the shed.

Lastly having patience, and an understanding wife
Die Launische Diva avatar
  • Avoid using Photoshop; use dedicated tools instead.
  • Learning how to take flats and how to properly calibrate my data.
  • Learning to plan my imaging sessions in order to avoid light pollution and those high clouds which makes gradient removal very hard.
  • Avoid learning AP from "popular" YouTube videos; prefer to read a book instead and don't afraid the math.
  • Be extremely skeptic to anyone who try to prove that we can skip essential pre-processing steps.
  • Spend a lot of time experimenting in pre-processing and avoid popular recipes which usually have mistakes.
  • Pushing my equipment to its limits before putting my hand into my wallet.
  • I have admitted that *I* am the weakest link in the process.


All except one of the above cost nothing.
Helpful Insightful Concise
andrea tasselli avatar
I wonder…

Never felt the need for an autofocuser so this is definitely a no-no. Cable snags? I barely recall ever having had one, so no. CC is a must, this goes without question. Autoguider, yeah. It took me few years but eventually came around the idea. Still I wish I didn't have to (fantasy mount).  Sharpcap polar alignment routine was a revelation to me as well and greatly appreciated (not that I use that often though). APT is a very good tool but I abhor automation, there you go I've said it. So no. Controlling everything remotely? And were is the fun in that? A big NO NO there. You are expected to suffer for the sake of the hobby and I had my derriere frozen stiff for too many nights to count (this night too, although my oldish bones aren't quite that happy anymore). PI is good, in fact very good but there are alternatives. Biggest improvement of all was when I set up the rigs out permanently.
Nadir Astro avatar
Clear skies. Really, nothing can replace and no money can buy a good, dark clear skies where you can practice and learn this hobby. Until recent few years and, I would say, revolution in amateur astrophotography in terms of good cheap astrocameras, easy to use software, etc. learning curve was very long and difficult with imaging process being hard, automation almost not possible and so on. Those who is in this hobby for more than 10 years will understand.

And AstroBin ofc. Ability to share your photos, learn from your mistakes and check what and how others are imaging - is priceless !
Sean van Drogen avatar
lots of the same things mentioned above.

I love of automation so electronic field rotator and deepskydad flap panel being the latest additions that made the biggest upgrades for me. No more time lost on optimal framing or going outside with flat panel in the morning.
Can now plan everything inside and make my sequence in NINA. At night setup and PA in about 25 minutes and let rip throughout the night.
In the morning pull out USB drive and transfer all data including automated flats to PI computer and get going.

Permanent setup would be the next thing but is kinda difficult living in an appartment with only a roofterrace available. Also preferably a permanent setup in bortle 4 or better location.

CS,
Sean
Torben van Hees avatar
In no particular order: Cooled mono with filterwheel. Autofocus. Learning collimation (work in progress).

While it has not improved my pictures directly (the mounts before it tracked mostly well enough when they did), the 10Micron mount has allowed me to focus on other areas than the mount and improve on those.
Gary Brennan avatar
What has helped me the most is not running over my mount and scope after countless nights with no results. 

Next most important was using Astroberry. I have all Mac computers so this allowed me to get set up and do remote imaging from the comfort of my home. Still working on processing but I think that is a life long pursuit. 

A good scope and mount is tied for #1 on the list as well.
Dale Penkala avatar
I’d have to say 95% of everything mentioned above. 2 others above mentioned AB and for me this site has been instrumental in learning AP better. I think that @Salvatore Iovene has put together a site that everyone regardless of there knowledge level and experience can learn something here. People like me that are complete nobs to the professionals.

Dale
Steve Perry avatar
My list: 1. a "check list" to avoid the mistakes during setup that I  made in the past (ie: lens caps left on, usb cables unplugged)
              2. get a grip on processing
              3. putting cement blocks in ground for in/outside setup
              4. checking with Astrobin during processing for idea what my results should  look like
              5. using N.I.N.A.
Jonathan Piques avatar
  • Learning pixinsight and investing lots of time learning how to process well. Once your equipment reaches a certain base level of quality, processing and skies are really all that matter. If you want a good place to learn pixinsight, subscribe to Adam Block’s website. He is extremely thorough and an outstanding imager who has forgotten more about pixinsight than I will ever learn. Invest the time: it will make a massive difference.

  • Learning that equipment doesn’t matter as much as you think. Yes, having a big fancy scope/mount can help you do things you couldn’t otherwise do, but you can make absolutely amazing images with a small refractor, modest mount, and modest camera. Mostly, more expensive gear can make life easier but that definitely doesn’t translate to good or better images. There are lots and lots of people who have extremely high end set ups but make mediocre images at best. Focus time on you and making your image capture technique and your processing as good as it can be before investing in that big scope / mount. I cannot underscore this enough.


On the topic of equipment though, in addition to a mount / camera / autoguider, and taking darks / flats / bias (a must…never skip), I recommend the following:
  • Autofocus. Get a motorfocuser and learn to automate it. Your images will be sharper and more consistent.
  • Mono camera. You will have the flexibility to do more, particularly with narrowband. I had light polluted skies for years and narrowband allowed me to capture more / better images than broadband alone. Even if you don’t go mono, at least get a dedicated cooled camera. They make a huge difference vs DSLRs.
  • Automation software. I use SGP but there are lots out there. It makes the capture process much more consistent and just easier.
  • Get away from the tethered laptop and get a NUC or ASIair or something comparable. Again, this won’t help you make better images, but it will make life easier. I got a NUC that rides on the scope and runs all the software and I remote in via Teamviewer from my couch. So much better than sitting out in the cold or mosquitos.
  • Finally, find dark skies. The biggest leap I experienced in my astrophotography, aside from getting a mono camera and learning pixinsight, was getting under dark skies. If you can’t, you can’t, but I promise it is worth the effort / expense if you do. You get far better, cleaner data and it is much easier to make decent images.
Helpful Insightful
Christian Koll avatar
My 2 cents:

1. Autoguider
2. A really sturdy tripod (Berlebach)
3. Don't just buy a telescope off the shelf, have a professional check and tune it!
4. Robert Gendler's book "Lessons from the Masters"; and in general: reading a lot about image processing and trying out different techniques
5. Plate solving (not in terms of image quality, but for saving a lot of time and getting better results e.g. for mosaics)

CS
Chris
Helpful Concise
geosock avatar
Remote imaging. I love being under dark skies, but accepting light pollution allows coziness while imaging, and frankly, that is a game changer.
dkamen avatar
Quitting guiding.
Rishi avatar
Spending a lot of time making sure I have good focus. I thought a Bathinov mask would get me perfect focus but I have found it is not enough. Gets you in the ballpark but not good enough. I take subs and magnify a smallish star as much as possible. Then the art is to make it as small as possible.

OAG for my Edge8HD with a guidecam with a large sensor (174).

Purchasing and learning (this is the kicker) PixInsight.
Julian Shroff avatar
Die Launische Diva:
  • Avoid using Photoshop and use dedicated tools instead.
  • Learning how to take flats and how to properly calibrate my data.
  • Learning to plan my imaging sessions in order to avoid light pollution and those high clouds which makes gradient removal very hard.
  • Avoid learning AP from "popular" YouTube videos; prefer to read a book instead and don't afraid the math.
  • Be extremely skeptic to anyone who try to prove that we can skip essential pre-processing steps.
  • Spend a lot of time experimenting in pre-processing and avoid popular recipes which usually have mistakes.
  • Pushing my equipment to its limits before putting my hand into my wallet.
  • I have admitted that *I* am the weakest link in the process.


All except one of the above cost nothing.

While I agree with many things you said, I don't quite see why YouTube should be a bad source, or Photoshop is unfit for astronomical image processing. The reality is that when it comes to non-linear processing, Photoshop can do the majority of the standard tasks programs like PixInsight utilize. I personally do most of my processing in PI, but as soon as the first stretch is performed, it is just a matter of preference which you use. The result is the same to beginners to intermediate imagers.

In my experience, understanding the technical aspects behind astrophotography was THE most determining factor for me. Understanding the importance of sensor sizes and aperture. Your goal should be to create absolutely fawless raw data. Beginning with the right exposure time and ending with perfectly calibrated raw files that look like a processed image after removing gradients. 

Once you understand that the first autostretch will show you most of whats in the image, it makes setting expectations a lot easier. If you can't see the nebulosity/dust after your first stretch, its highly unlikely that you will get a clean image of it.

Most of all: Never acquire the mindset "I know enough".
Helpful Insightful Engaging Supportive
mackiedlm avatar
My ASI2600mc pro. The step up from my previous DSLR is simply astonishing.
Die Launische Diva avatar
Julian Shroff:
While I agree with many things you said, I don't quite see why YouTube should be a bad source, or Photoshop is unfit for astronomical image processing. The reality is that when it comes to non-linear processing, Photoshop can do the majority of the standard tasks programs like PixInsight utilize. I personally do most of my processing in PI, but as soon as the first stretch is performed, it is just a matter of preference which you use. The result is the same to beginners to intermediate imagers.

I totally agree with you, but unfortunately there is more probability to find bad advice in a YT video than in a book. I am worried because for some of the videos there might exist an underlying youtuber/hardware vendor relation. This may drive the novice to a need for spending more before mastering the fundamentals.

On the other hand, books soon become outdated, especially regarding software...
Well Written Insightful Respectful Concise Engaging
Scott Badger avatar
My somewhat obsessive refusal to let Murphy win…..
kuechlew avatar
Die Launische Diva:
...
  • .I have admitted that *I* am the weakest link in the process.

...

Certainly number two on my list.

#1: The revelation that astrophotography is possible at all from within a bortle 7 zone.
#3: Stepping back to way shorter focal lengths after trying to start with a MAK 127
#4: Managing my expectations what I can achieve at my current beginner level with my current gear
#5: Reading a lot and checking the youtube videos for credibility
#6: Joining astrobin and studying the top pics, in particular those taken with equipment similar to mine and with integration times within my comfort zone.
#7: Learning not to depend too much on my goto mount (work in progress)
Helpful
Ronny May avatar
Post processing is everything. There are so many people with highly expensive equipment but the pictures are looking like crap, sry to say that. They aren't learning new techniques for years but they are buying more and more expensive stuff. Useless… On the other hand there are great pictures with low budget equipment. But it takes most of the time to learn it. Money isn't the key.
Roy Hagen avatar
1. Practise
2. Practise
3. Practise
4. Practise
5. Practise
Jonathan Piques avatar
Ronny May:
Post processing is everything. There are so many people with highly expensive equipment but the pictures are looking like crap, sry to say that. They aren't learning new techniques for years but they are buying more and more expensive stuff. Useless... On the other hand there are great pictures with low budget equipment. But it takes most of the time to learn it. Money isn't the key.

A thousand times this, as I said in my post above. Processing makes *all* the difference. Study images on astrobin that you like. Read the captions to see if they talk about how they did it. See if they have websites where they teach techniques. You absolutely can make incredible images with relatively inexpensive equipment under light polluted skies (particularly if you do narrowband under the latter).
Helpful Insightful Engaging Supportive
Ronny May avatar
Die Launische Diva:
  • Avoid using Photoshop and use dedicated tools instead.
  • Learning how to take flats and how to properly calibrate my data.
  • Learning to plan my imaging sessions in order to avoid light pollution and those high clouds which makes gradient removal very hard.
  • Avoid learning AP from "popular" YouTube videos; prefer to read a book instead and don't afraid the math.
  • Be extremely skeptic to anyone who try to prove that we can skip essential pre-processing steps.
  • Spend a lot of time experimenting in pre-processing and avoid popular recipes which usually have mistakes.
  • Pushing my equipment to its limits before putting my hand into my wallet.
  • I have admitted that *I* am the weakest link in the process.


All except one of the above cost nothing.

*** all my pictures are made with Photoshop I also still can learn :-P  ***
Related discussions
Which scope for galaxy imaging? 8" f/4 Newton, RC8, or 5" Triplet?
Hi everyone, long post incoming - excuse my ramblings - after I finally moved to a place with a secluded and safe roof terrace where I have enough space to put up two rigs, I'll plan to add another rig for smaller Targets next to my CEM25P with a...
Discusses telescope selection for imaging, relevant to equipment improvements.
Apr 23, 2023
How I build my observatory and what I would do different if I had to do it all over.
Before I start. English is not my first language, so I'm sorry if there are misspellings or maybe the way I phrase things are not correct. I did my best. Why an observatory? When I started this hobby back in 2018, I bought a used C8 Edge HD on a ...
Observatory building experience could inform equipment setup optimization.
Sep 28, 2023
DEC going nutts
Hello everyone! I'm at a point where I run out of ideas what to do and I hope someone can help me. My Gear: CEM 70, ZWO everything with AsiAir, EAF, 120mm mini, ES ED 127mm I have a journey of tracking problems behind me and it just won't sto...
ASCOM/mount automation troubleshooting relevant to author's autoguider and ASCOM adoption.
Aug 11, 2023
ASI2600 Pro shipped today!!
GREAT NEWS! the ASI2600 Pro I ordered in January just shipped from HighPoint! I’ve been using and learned on a used Canon 1000D. It has served me well but I’m so ready to move on. Now for another learning curve…I really don’t know what to expec...
Discusses equipment improvements in astrophotography, relevant to new camera transition.
May 15, 2020
Ideas for handling different setups - how do you deal with your equipment
Hi all of you, over the last three or four years, since I began to do astro photography. I developed a method of handling my equipment. This works for me. But before I write some lines about it, I want to explain the reason for this thread. Astro pho...
Equipment handling methods relevant to author's multi-component setup evolution.
Aug 27, 2023