Hello,
On my HEQ5 (rowan) : T200/800 UNC + tube rings + camera + corrector = less than 8,5 KG (finder scope 0,5 Kg is useless and not installed –> astrometry ) / No tripod –> "fixed column" / OAG / RMS between min 0,35" and max 0,9" - often between 0,5" & 0.7" (depending on seeing and polaris distance at 7 meters altitude & dew)/ polar alignment with sharpcap / PHD2 guiding / OAG requiered a (very) long adjustment period in order to obtain a "good guiding " : really "sensitive" for PHD2 algorithm (round stars in corners & edges + guiding camera focus - altair 178M )
Between optical adjustment (OAG & F/D 4…) & Payload limit , I wonder where is the "max" payload of my mount (photo) : under 1" RMS today, even on celestial equator .
Wind < 15km/h seems to be a limit (for T200/800)
1,20" = imaging camera (échantillonnage) so "it's OK", the less RMS is the best it is (long exposure 720" , and more are Ok : limits are camera's exposure limit , not guiding ). If payload would be > 8,5 Kg , I think that it could be "a little bit more" difficult to get a RMS < 1,20" at celestial equator (but "not elsewhere") requiered by imaging camera It also depends on tube lenght (cantilevered / porte-à-faux) . RMS value is a good indicator for testing payload. It could be a good test to build a kind of "weight belt" placed around the tube center for checking max payload in fact.
Sorry for english, hopping it's understandable
