Do We really need to buy expensive Binoculars for Astronomy?

3 replies127 views
Szijártó Áron avatar
Hello and welcome. I'd like to ask everyone here that. Do we really need to buy expensive binoculars for astronomy or not?
Since the earlier forum,m I have stated that I will be planning to get a Nikon Aculon 10 50 binocular. I started to look for some helpful articles that helped me choose what binoculars I should get.
And they said my only best bet is to get an expensive one cause cheaper binoculars aren't any good or what. So I got really confused about what now. What if I don't have much money to buy expensive ones? Does anyone have any recommendations for astronomy binoculars? That can help to see the planets and stuff; let's say it can be handheld and also has good quality, and it won't Shake. Anyone can recommend names like Nikon, Canon or any binocular that is good enough for astronomy.
andrea tasselli avatar
If you want to look at surface details of any planet then binocular are not the right tool (except maybe for those exceedingly expensive and/or heavy). Handheld and not shaking means either very small (and thus essentially useless for anything more than a casual look at the stars) or largish and with image stabilization which are rather expensive. Good quality only comes at a rather stiff price and if they are also large (the larger the better) they would require a suitable tripod for any meaningful utlization and proper tripods for that use (and attendant mount) aren't cheap either. So, bottom line (1): yes thay have to be expensive and usually in more ways than one. And bottom line (2): get a dobsonian and be done with it, even a 6" will show way more than any reasonably priced bino.

P.S.: My choice would be the Canon IS series.
John Hayes avatar
I have two pairs of binoculars that I use for looking at the sky.  The first are 15x70 binoculars from Celestron and the second are 16x70mm binoculars from Astro-Physics.  My understanding is that the binoculars that Astro-Physics sold were sourced maybe from a Russian company but I’m not sure.  I don’t think that AP offers them anymore. They are very stout with water proof rubber cladding and an Astro-Physics label.  There are vast differences between these two sets of binoculars, which is why my experience is relevant to the OPs question.  The Celestron set has “nice” image correction with noticeable distortion and chromatic error around the edge of the field.  The eye relief is good on both sets but a bit tight for wearing glasses.  My Celestron’s are probably around 15 years old and some of the rubber cladding is chemically coming apart—turning into a weird sticky goo.  The Astro-Physics set does not have center focusing, which is a bit of a pain but the image quality is absolutely superb.  I’ve directly compared my AP binoculars to the highest quality Zeiss and Leica binoculars and differences in image quality are hard to spot.  Distortion is very low and the color correction is superb.  The view through the Astro-Physics binoculars is immersive.  The field is very wide and the image is tack sharp.

Under the sky, the differences are very noticeable.  At first glance, the view through the Celestron’s looks “ok” and seems fine until you switch to the higher quality view through the Astro-Physics optics.   Star images snap into absolutely pin-points across the entire field.   Image contrast is superb, subtle strays disappear, and the star colors are deeply saturated.  The width of the field of view is stunning and it’s like looking through a port hole into space.  I put the Celestron binoculars back on the shelf as soon as I got the Astro-Physics binoculars.  The only real disadvantage of the AP binoculars is the weight.  They are noticeably heavier than the Celestron’s and it’s hard to manually sweep the sky for very long before getting tired.  It helps to work out a bit before long night-time sessions!

The bottom line here is that if you want to look at the sky through binoculars, there can be a very big difference in what you see depending on the quality of the binoculars that you use.  Bigger binoculars give an even more impressive view but remember that weight makes a difference in how long you can hold them pointed up.  Big or small, my advice is to get the best possible optics that you can afford.  Make sure that the eye relief is acceptable and that the field of view is wide.  If you get a good pair of binoculars, they should last for a life time of sweeping the sky and you won’t regret it.

John
Helpful Insightful Respectful Engaging Supportive
Arny avatar
I inherited an excellent Steiner 7x50 Navigator intended for sailing, so watertight, autofocus and a bearing compass included:
- never need to refocus for anything betwwn 500m and infinity
- absolut perfect collimation
- scratch resistant surfaces
- impeccable image
- evenly illuminating
- zero artefacts
- brilliant image
- just about possible to use it in your hands, but of course much better on a tripod or at least resting your albows
= perfectly wonderful

Being magnification greedy I could not resist an 20x80 Bresser astro binocular for about 1/2th of the price of the Steiner:
- good magnification and light collection but unbrilliant image
- large and heavy 
- very shaky so only usable on a tripod
- very poorly collimated and not effectively collimatible (works in theory but not practically)

So for looking the sky or moon I always use the Steiner - and would go again for oversized or inexpensive binoculars.

Arny
Helpful
Related discussions
How to Make an good astronomical mount with the EQ8-R (or ORION HD110) using Shibumi Astro Kits (long post with photos)
Hi all, This is my first post here. I'm not an English speaker, so I apologize in advance if there are any language errors in the post. There's little practical information online about improving the quality of the Chinese-made EQ8-R. Or Orion HD110 ...
Discusses equipment selection and setup for astronomy observations.
27 days ago
TS ONTC 200/900 f4.5 Carbon tube
Hello, I am currently looking to upgrade my main imaging tube to one of TS' ONTC carbon tubes and I was looking at the 8" f4.5 one. Before I pull the trigger I wanted to put my ear to the ground and see what people say about it? If anyone on...
Not relevant; discusses binoculars, not imaging tubes or telescopes.
Oct 4, 2022
Hi there!
I'm Dan, a college student from Denver. I love design and enjoy traveling as much as possible. I like to learn about the stars, planets and other objects in space. It is fascinating to me to think about how big and old the universe is. I also enj...
Discusses binocular selection for astronomy, directly relevant to stated interest.
Oct 18, 2022